This makes accurate measurements meaningless and arbitrary, because meaning can be derived from any chart regardless of if it’s the right one or not, as long as its the one you saw “in that moment”. Others try to sidestep this entire question by basically giving up on the entire idea that astrology has objective correlations, chalking astrology up to being purely divinatory. What’s worse is that if it does work for everyone regardless of what zodiac you use, then it helps the astrology skeptic’s point that astrology isn’t a real phenomenon and isn’t based on accurate or consistent measurements. This is really just a different spin on the all-time least convincing justification in astrology “It works for me”, even though very few astrologers are actively using both zodiacs. We hear the phrase “They both work” but without a real explanation of how two conflicting zodiacs can work. To this end, I think many astrologers are in denial of even acknowledging the widening gap between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs. Most astrologers, even if they’re exclusively tropical or sidereal, don’t want to write off the other as just “wrong”. How can modern astrologers using the sidereal zodiac and the tropical zodiac both be right? Lot of Fortune in the Signs Menu ToggleĪstrology Skeptic: The tropical and sidereal zodiacs have drifted about 24 degrees apart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |